Rethinking future career paths

Posted: December 26, 2009 in Uni
Tags: ,

Ever since I was little, I have always wanted to be an auditor. As absurd as this may seem, it is the truth. While most kids dreamed about flying fighter planes or riding on a red choo-choo, I dreamed of money and the prestige of having a CA (SA) next to my name. But all this is about to change.

A short while ago, I read an article in the FM magazine, which basically wrote that auditors have an unlimited personal liability. (Seriously?!?!?!) In other words, if I was to audit a limited liability company and I failed to pick up on fraudulent activities, investors of the said company could initiate a lawsuit against me and I would have to pay for the damages. (Recent case study: one of the big four auditing firms, PricewaterhouseCoopers, is being sued for R7.6 bn for failing to disclose the fraud relating to the late Brett Kebble.) No wonder the country is struggling to recruit more auditors into the field (the number currently stands at 4 500, and has been for the past several years).

When doctors malpractice, they are covered by insurance. When a Pty (Ltd) goes bust, it is protected by limited liability. So, why should an audit company have to operate with potential million-Rand lawsuits breathing down its neck? SAICA has since been pushing for a more equitable position whereby liability is shared or limited to a multiple of the audit fee, but the proposal has been “universally rejected”.

One of the reasons why I chose auditing as opposed to financial management was because I was under the illusion that financial managers worked under a great amount of stress, while auditors did not (relatively speaking of course). The illusion has since been cleared. Luckily, I have not yet signed away my soul to anyone, so I still have a couple of options left: 1) Stay on the auditing path and hope I don’t get sued, or 2) Change to financial management and sign with Investec or one of the banks.

Decisions, decisions…

Thoughts/feedbacks are welcomed.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. John says:

    I think the principle behind it is that auditors don’t get away will million-rand blunders and then plead incompetence in court. This way, on the best and brightest will be prepared to actually do the job. Doctors wouldn’t do what they do if there wasn’t malpractice insurance. Unlike with auditors, their margin for error can often lead to death or disfigurement, rather than just a loss of money.

    Also, how is financial management less stressful? :p

    I would say do International Relations, but that’s just me!

  2. aimzy waimzy says:

    I said financial management was -more- stressful :P

    Bleh @ international relations…I’m afraid that doesn’t interest me at all )=

  3. Justin says:

    You’ll get liability insurance, so you won’t fork out yourself, much like doctors.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s